четверг, 5 августа 2010 г.

National Hero of Azerbaijan

Mubariz Aghakerim oglu Ibrahimov  (February 7, 1988, Əliabad, Bilasuvar Rayon, Azerbaijan - June 19, 2010, Çaylı, Tartar Rayon, Azerbaijan) was an Azerbaijani Warrant Officer and National Hero of Azerbaijan.

He was shot dead from the back by Armenian forces near the village of Çaylı of Tartar Rayon in 19 June 2010. Ibrahimov has killed at least four (but the eye witnesses say the amount of killed armenians was 140) and wounded five Armenian soldiers before falling in the battle. Before proceeding he wrote a letter to his parents to inform them about his plan to pass the border and kill as many armenians as he could and not stop until he died. In his letter he asked his parents not to feel sorry in case he died and told them that he could not take what armenians have done to his nation so far assuring them that it was an honorable mission he'd assigned for himself.

On 22 July 2010 President Ilham Aliyev signed a decree to perpetuate the memory of Azerbaijan’s National Hero Mubariz Ibrahimov. The Cabinet of Ministers is empowered to ensure the naming of one of the secondary schools of Bilesuvar after Mubariz Ibrahimov and the executive powers of Bilesuvar are empowered to ensure the naming of one of the streets after Mubariz Ibrahimov.




 03 August 2010 [12:30] - Today.Az .

          Yesterday, photos of Azerbaijani national hero Mubariz Ibrahimov have surfaced. Armenians put the photos of his dead body online, on the infamous Russian social website "Odnoklassniki". Other picture shows Ibrahimov lying on the stretcher with his hands tied up. Some sources online claim, that the body belongs to another soldier, killed on the frontline. Others claim the opposite.




One thing is for certain: A man, who died, defending his motherland, cannot even be buried properly. His body is still in the posession of Armenian forces. Ibrahimov managed to kill four enemy soldiers, wounded four more, and was killed after that.

God bless you brother. Rest in peace.Your body is captivated,but your soul is free. We are dead, but you are alive.You will live in our hearts forever.

среда, 4 августа 2010 г.

Lie , outrageous , white lie and Armenian History (with facts)


History Of Armenians



Source: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Azerbaijani Republic



It is as a well-known fact that the Armenians are not autochthons on the territory of Asia Minor (historical Turkey), nor in Caucasus. According to specialists in history of the Armenian nation, the Armenian of the Phrygian tribes, originally habitants of the Balkans, joined the movement of the Kimmerians, and came to Asia Minor in the 8th century B. C. Later they set out East up to the Euphrates. ‘The history of the Armenian nation’, its latest edition, says that in the 12th century B. C. the territories of the Khurrites, Khetts and Luvians (the Upper Euphrates) were invaded by groups of Indo-European Armenian- speaking tribes, named, the Mushku and Urumu in Assyrian cuneiforms, the Arims in Greek ones, and later referred to As Armenians. Manuk Abegyan, another prominent armenist, writes: “What is the origin the Armenian people? When and how did it establish itself in Armenia? Where did it come from and what were its ways to get to its homeland? What tribes had it associated with before and after coming to Armenia? Who and in what way affected its language, its ethnic composition?-these are the questions which were still are debatable, since we have no exact and detailed information on this matter”.



We are going to give a brief study of the main turning points in the history of Armenian people, for it really is a true history of the nation, of Armenian colonies, scattered over a large geographical area. But that is not history of a state. Therefore every scientific publications concerned with this problem is titled “The History of the Armenian Nation”, though authors of those publications made quite ungrounded and illegitimate attempts to introduce a history of the Armenian state, Armenia. The concept of “Armenia” is used in two meanings - a geographical meaning and a political one. As a political concept Armenia has long become obsolete, ceased to be a country, the latter being defined as political entry.



The first Armenian state was established in Asia Minor in the 6th century B. C. and continued up to 428. From the 6th century B. C. to the 3rd century B. C. Armenia was composed of two satraps: Eastern Armenia and Western Armenia. These satraps were first governed by the Akhmenids, then by Alexander of Macedonia, and finally by the Selevkids. In the 2nd and 1stcenturies B. C. (under Artashes the 1st and Tigran the 2nd) the territory of the Armenian state was enlarged. After he had been defeated by Roman Commander Pompeii, Tigran the 2nd lost all lands conquered. He only retained Armenia as such, within the limits of the Armenian Plateau.



It is still an open question as to what territory is considered to be the Armenian Plateau.



Later, from the 1st century B. C. and the year of 428, in accordance with its political status, Armenia was a nominal state, being actually a province of Persia and Rome - Bysantium. Armenia was under the rule of Persian and Roman Governor- General represented either by Atropatenian or Iberian (Georgian) princes. During that period Armenia was repeatedly split into parts by the two Empires- Rome and Persia ( in the year of 66 B. C., years of 37, 298, 387). As a result of it, part of Armenia, turned over to Bysantium, was named Western Bysantine Armenia (to the west of the Euphrates), the other part, ceded to Persia, was called Eastern Persian Armenia (to the east of the Euphrates). The Armenians began sharing the history of those nations which had conquered the country.



From the 9th to the 11th centuries and in the 12th -14th centuries attempts were made to restore the Armenian kingdom.



In the 9th-11th centuries Armenian state ruled by the Bagaratides was set up in the area of Kars, with Any as capital city. According to the recent study of the Bagaratides Kingdom, Yuzfashyan K.N. claims that in the 9th-11th centuries a number of Armenian kingdoms were founded, among them: 1) “The Greater Armenian Kingdom”, with the capital in Kars, Shairakavan, Any, ruled by the Bagratides; 2) the Kingdom of Vaspurakan with Van as a capital city, ruled by the Astrunides; 3) the Kars or Vanad Kingdom (the capital city in Kars), seceded from the Greater Armenia and ruled by a collateral line of the Bagratides. In addition to the just mentioned Armenian kingdoms established on the “primordial Armenian soil”, there are some other states allegedly Armenian. K. Yuzfashyan makes an attempt to rang among Armenian states some Albanian ones of the synchronous period: the Sunik Kingdom (Syrian and Kafan as capital cities), ruled by Albanian kings of the Mikhranid line, and the Lory Kingdom, or Tashir, Dzagaret (Shahmshuld Lory as capital cities).



K. Yuzfashyan, as well as other Armenian historians are quite deliberate in making claims like those stated above doing this in purpose, so that in centuries to follow, when the Armenian people lost its statehood and lands, to make it possible to join foreign lands, the Albanian kingdom, i. e. the lands of historical Georgia (Gogarena). It should be noted that such a tendentious trend has always been typical of Armenian researches, over the whole period of making their history. One should keep in mind that a biased way of presenting was characteristic of the Early Medieval Armenian historians, Favstor Buzandaty and Movses Khorenatsy. That was a tendentious and absolutely groundless conception of a “Greater Armenia- from sea to sea”. As to the centuries that followed, Armenian scholars maintain that in the 12th -14th centuries there appeared Armenian Kilikian Kingdom, but it occupied another territory, that of the North-East Meditterranian shore. Since then no Armenian political formations have been found on the territory of historical Turkey.



As soon as the Ottoman Empire was formed, the Armenians lost any hope to found their own state in Asia Minor. They turn their eyes on the Caucasus, historical Azerbaijan, cheri­shing plans of purging Caucasus by making it free from Azer­baijan Turki. The makers of the "History of the Armenian na­tion" bring into scientific use the term of "Eastern Armenia" but quite in a different interpretation. Note that since the 16th century and up to now this term has implied Azerbaijani lands only - Yerevan, Ganja, Karabakh, Sunik. Thus, the concept of "Eastern Armenia" shifts both in time and space, from, the East of the Euphrates over to Caucasia.



About the 19th century, after Azerbaijan joined Russia, the first Armenian settlements appeared in Azerbaijan, and the first Armenian refugees came from Turkey, Iran.



As far as the backbone of the Armenians is concerned, it is known to be scattered all over the Minor-Asian part of Turkey and other countries. Thus, the latest edition of the "History of (he Armenian nation" (1980) says about the 16th-19th centu­ries: "According to the administrative composition of the Os-man Empire, Western Armenia was divided into pashalyks, among them the pashalyks of Ergezum, Kars, Sebastiya, Van, Diarbekir. A number of khanates were formed in Eastern Ar­menia and Azerbaijan, including the khanates of Yerevan, Nakhichevan, Karabakh, Shirvan and others". We can see that all of the above-mentionedkhanates were known to be Azer­baijani ones. And the question still remains open .as to what lands from Eastern Armenia. Moreover, the histories of the Armenian nation say nothing at all about the Azerbaijani beg-lar-beyates which preceded the khanates. In reality, in the 16th-17th centuries Azerbaijan was composed of the following bcglar-beyatcs: the Shirvan, Karabakh (or Ganja) beglar-beya-te, the Chukhur-Saad (or Yerevan) beglar-beyatc, the Azerbai­jan (or Tebriz) beglar-beyate. Yerevan and Nakhichevan were places of residence ("ulka") for the Kyzylbash tribe Ustajlu, with Chukhur-Saad being their hereditary ulka. It follows then that there was no Eastern Armenia on those lands. It should be specifically noted that the Karabakh beglar-beyate included a vast area between the Araks and the Kure. Among the towns on this territory were Kazakh, Shamshadly, Lory and Pambak. After the Azerbaijan khanates had been formed, the Karabakh beglar-beyate was turned into the Karabakh khanate. At the same time, some smaller political administrative units were set up on the territory of Azerbaijan. They were called sultanates, among them were the Kazakh and Shamshadly sultanates. The reason I pay special attention to Kazakh, Shamshadly, Lory, Pambak and Yerevan is because it is exactly these regions that Armenian historians look upon and claim to be the so-called Eastern Armenia.



Now, back to the 19th century. Let's tern to the "History of the Armenian nation" and sec how it treats Caucasia's joining Russia: "In 1801, Eastern Georgia was annexed to Russia, and so were some Northern regions of Armenia, including Georgia-bordering Lory-Pambak and Shamshadly regions".



As it was pointed out above, these regions were Azerbaijani ones, Armenian historians deliberately make them part of Russia prior to Azerbaijan khanates' joining Russia in 1805 and 1828. The sole aim is to separate these lands from Azerbai­jan and join them to Russia, thus claiming them to be the pseu­do-Eastern Armenia as part of Russia. However, in reality the peace negotiations of 1805 resulted in the Karabakh, Sheky, Shirvan khanates' receiving Russian citizenship. Fierce wars during the period of 1806-1813 (Campaigns of Tsitianov, Gudovitch, General Kotlyarovsky) ended in conquering the Talysh, Baku, Kuba, Ganja, Derbent khanates. In 1826-1827 the Yerevan khanate (with the majority of population being Azerbaijan Turki) was conquered. The Khan of Yerevan together with his! brother (the Azerbaijan tine of the Maki Khans) fought desperately against Russian invaders in the North of the Southern Azerbaijan. In 1827 the Khan of Nakhichevan capitulated. I was in Russia's interest to increase the Armenian population in the Caucasus, amass more Russia-oriented Armenian-christians' in the regions bordering Turkey and Persia. In this way Russia intended to win the Turkish Armenians'' favour and get sup port in Asia Minor. Thus, special articles were embodied into the Turkmenchai and Adrianopol treaties, which granted the Armenians the right to move to Caucasus- the lands of Georgia and Azerbaijan. It was then that the first Armenian refuge­es came to Karabakh, Zangazur. A special Committee was set up to solve this problem. In 1828-1830 alone, 130.000 Armenians moved there. Following the 1828 Turkmenchai treaty, the Tzarist Government forms up a new political division - an Armenian region composed of Yerevan uyezds, Nakhichevan uyezd and Ordubady district, governed by the Tzarist officials In 1849 the Armenian region was abolished, and four provinces were formed, among them the Yerevan province (including Yerevan uyezd, Nakhichevan uyezd and Ordubady district), Tiflis province, Yelizavetpol and Baku provinces. But the Tzarist government cherished the idea of establishing an Arme­nian region on the soils of Minor-Asian Turkey, thus making an attempt to "secure a firm footing on the Armenian Plateau".



The slogan of (the "struggle for Christians'' liberation from I the yoke of Moslem Turkey" served as a cover for the Russian Tzarism's ambitions to conquer the Black Sea, the Bosphorus and the Dardanneles. There was a special paragraph No 16 which Russia entered into the San-Stefano treaty of 1878, according to which Turkey took up the responsibility to carry out necessary reforms in Armenian regions. Until the reforms had been performed, the Russian troops kept the conquered Turkish regions under occupation. A number of European states, first of all England, demanded that the treaty be re­considered. In 1878, June 1, a Congress was held in Berlin, where paragraph No 16 was replaced by Article 61 to confirm the Turkish Government's responsibility for carrying out necessary reforms in the Armenian provinces. But there was an essential amendment: now the control over the reforms was passed over to Six Powers, So, the problem of Western Armenia was turned into the "Armenian question" during the San-Stephano and Berlin talks in 1878. Actually, it was only the Tzarist Russia who spoke definitely for solving the Armenian question. With this end in view, two political parties were founded - "Gnchak" ("Bell"), 1887, and "Dashnaktsutyun", 1890. Having settled in the Russian Transcaucasia, they sent out their propagandists to Turkey, formed insurgent detachments to attract attention of Great Powers to the fate of the Armenians. In-the strive to reach its goals, the "Dashnaktsutyun" Party frequently changes its orientation -from the Russian and European states to the All-Turkey revolutionary movement, then to Russia again. According to Milyukov, the Armenians', "stuck at the cross-roads between Russia and Turkey", on the eve of World War I acquired great political significance. During the Balkans war (1912-1914) Russia put forward a program on creation of an autonomous Armenian region in Turkey, the so-called Western Armenia, made up of a number of vilayets, among them: Erzurum, Van, Bitlis, Diyarbekir, Kharput, Sivas. Western Armenia was to be governed by a Christian governor-general appointed by Turkey by consent of European countries. But Europe did not back up this program.



The February and October revolutions of 1917 marked a new turning point in the Armenian question. In October, 1917, Armenian National Congress was held in Tiflis, which demanded on behalf of all Armenians that Russia keep those territories of Turkish Armenia which had been occupied by the Russian troops during World War 1. The idea of setting up Western Armenia was also favoured by V. I. Lenin, who signed a Decree in 1917, October 28, under which Soviet Russia declared the right of the so-called Western Armenia to self-determination.



In May, 1918, when the Transcaucasian Seim broke up to give rise to the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic and the Georgian Democratic Republic, the Armenian Bourgeois Independent Republic was proclaimed in Tiflis, having neither territory nor capital city. The Azerbaijan Democratic Republic on May 29, 1918, yielded Erivan to the Armenian Republic, this city later becoming its capital.



The territory of the Armenian Republic was actually reduced to the uyezds of Erivan and Echmiadzin, with the population of 400.000.



After World War 1, the Great Powers looked upon the Armenians as a support against both Turkey (in Kilikiya) and Soviet Russia (in Transcaucasia). The Entente passed the Kars region over to the Armenian Republic. The uyezds of the Erivan province, which had been seized by Turkey, were also transferred to the Armenian Republic. The population of the Armenian Republic amounted to 1.510.000, including 795.000 Armenians, 575.000 Moslems (Azerbaijan Turks), 140.000 other nationalities. Being not satisfied with this, the dashnaks made territorial claims on Akhalkalak and Gocharly, included into the Georgian Republic, as well as some Azerbaijan lands - Karabakh, Nakhichevan area. Zangezur (Southern part of the Yelizavetpol province), being part of Azerbaijan. These attempts led to a war with Georgia and a bloody protracted war with Azerbaijan. The Armenian Republic, unlawfully as usual, by brute force began annexing Azerbaijan lands. In summer 1918, the Armenian Army headed by Andronik invaded Zangezur, presenting an ultimatum either to submit to their rule, or abandon the long occupied lands. According toMikhailov's committee of inquiry, during the summer of 1918 alone, 115 Azerbaijan villages were destroyed, more than 7.000 Azerbaijan killed and 50.000 left Zangezur. The war waged in Karabakh was particularly outrageous. In 1919-1920 Europe lost any interest in Armenia, and put the problem of Armenia's fate into the hands of the North-American imperialists. The Supreme Council of the League of Nations admitted that Armenia couldn't exist "without support".



US President Wilson was charged with the League's mission to determine Armenia's boundaries, and generously gave Armenia the greater pan of the Erzurum and Trapezund vilayets, as well as the whole of the Billis and Van vilayets, total area of 30.000 square miles, with the coastline of 150 miles, American politicians considered the Armenian question to be a European question, and by a majority of votes it was rejected by the Senate. A similar slop was taken by the French Government with respect to the Armenians of Kilikiya, occupied by France in 1919. When the Turks launched hostilities against the French, the latter recommended that the Armenians establish an independent stale in Kilikiya under the French protectorate. They also charged the Armenians with mounting punitive expeditions against the rebellious Moslem population. After the French had been defeated, in l921 France signed a peace treaty with Turkey, according to which it withdrew its claims on Kilikiya. The Armenians were defeated, part of them killed (20.000). the rest, being not numerous, fled to Syria, Cyprus, Egypt. Thus, one of the two "Armenian bases" was done away with. The Armenian question focused on the Transcaucasia, where dashnaks pursued the policy of bellicose nationalism. In May 1919, the dashnaks assumed the offensive, which entailed the downfall of the puppet "Araks Republic". Soon they were forced out of Nakhichevan, and in August, 1919 they were compelled to sing a cease-fire agreement In March, 1920, there were skirmishes with the dashnaks in Karabakh, Nakhichevan, Ordubad. Shusha. The fightings broke out in Khankendy, Terter, Askeran, in the Zangezur, Gebrayil, Nakhichevan, Ganja uyezds. Dozens of Azerbaijan villages were destroyed. Upon receiving weapons from Great Britain and Italy, the dashnaks perpetrated a mass massacre of the Moslem Turkic population throughout the Kars and Erivan provinces. In October, 1920, the Eastern Turkish Army, headed by Karabekir and Khali-Pasha defeated the troops of the Erivan Government, having taken Kars, Alexandropol and forced the Armenians to make a most crushing peace. Twice the dashnaks called on the governments of the USA, Great Britain, France, Italy, to render aid, but got no positive answer. It November, 1920 the dashnaks were overthrown and the Soviet Power was established. The remnants of Dashnaks in Zangezur formed a "Sunic Government" (Republic of the Mountainside Armenia) in December, 1920. And it was only in June-July, 1921 that Zangezur was free from dashnaks.



The Russian-Turkey agreement of 1921 denounced the Alexandropol peace treaty and fixed the borderline between the Armenian Republic and Turkey the way we have it today. Since then the statehood of the Armenian nation has started.



In this article 1 do not touch upon the Turkish government's wise policy on the Armenian question, which helped to remove the problem of creation of the so-called Western Armenia on the Turkish territory. This issue should be given an individual treatment. Within the limits of the present article 1 have tried to make a brief survey of other aspects of Armenian stale formation.



After the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic had fallen, Soviet Russia become well aware of the fact that the idea of founding Western Armenia was not feasible and decided to form the so-called Eastern Armenia from the Azerbaijan lands of the former Erivan khanate, Zangezur lands, when hundreds of, thousands of Armenians had been relocated by that moment. Research papers by Armenian historians give false interpretation to the historical fads and events of 1918-1920 and those of all the preceding periods of history. Thus, they claim that the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic made frequent attempts to conquer Nagorny Karabakh Nakhichevan and Zangezur. But in reality these regions had Committee, spoke against the declaration and slated that the Revolutionary Committee had betrayed the interests of Nakhichevan. B. Shakhtatinsky called upon the Nakhichevan population to assume Turkish orientation. He said: "Now you turn your eyes on the Turks, they are our sole salvation. Hold on firm to them".



In 1921, March 16, according to the treaty signed by Turkey and Soviet Russia, legal foundation was laid for establishing Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic in Azerbaijan Article 3 of the above-mentioned treaty reads: "The Nakhichevan region, within the borders stated in Appendix 1(c) of the present treaty, forms an autonomous territory under the protectorate of Azerbaijan, provided Azerbaijan shall not turn the protectorate over to a third country". Soon, under pressure of the Azerbaijan population, N. Narimanov, Chairman of the Azerbaijan Council of People's Commissars, demanded that Nagorny Karabakh remain part of Azerbaijan. N. Narimanov stated that "... should Nagorny Karabakh be annexed to Armenia, the Council of People's Commissars waives any responsibility, since if this is a case, we thus regenerate anti-Soviet groups in Azerbaijan". On the basis of this statement, on July 5, 1921 a meeting of Caucasian Bureau look a decision to leave Nagorny Karabakh within the territory of the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic, providing it with wide autonomy, thus forming an autonomous region in Azerbaijan.


Armenians claim this lands of neighbour countries.But history proves that there were no Armenia in caucasus at all.
                                                                   

"Armenian Genocide" or "Genocide by Armenians"

Turkish Armed Forces historical archives have been opened up for investigation by international history scholars.




Here are some examples of what the Dashnak armenians commited against the turks in 1912-1922:



LeHitraOt

Kara

1910 Muş (10 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

21 February 1914 Kars-Ardahan (30 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1915 Van (44 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1915 Van (150 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1915 Bitlis (16 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1915 Muş (80 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1915 Bitlis-Hizan (113 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1915 Van (5 thousand 200 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

February 1915 Haskay (200 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

February 1915 Dutak (3 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

April 1915 Bitlis (29 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

April 1915 Muradiye (10 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

April 1915 Van (120 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

May 1915 Van (20 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

July 1915 Muş-Akзan (19 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

August 1915 Mьkьs (126 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

9 May 1915 Bitlis (40 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

9 May 1915 Bitlis (123 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

15 January 1916 Terme (9 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1 April 1916 Van-Reşadiye (15 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

May 1916 Muş (500 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

8 May 1916 Van-Tatvan(thousand 600 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

8 May 1916 Bitlis (10 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

8 May 1916 Pasinler (2 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

8 May 1916 Tercan (563 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

11 May 1916 Van (44 thousand 233 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

11 May 1916 Malazgirt (20 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

11 May 1916 Bitlis (12 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

22 May 1916 Van (thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

22 May 1916 Kцprьkцy-Van (200 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

22 May 1916 Van (15 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

22 May 1916 Van (8 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

22 May 1916 Van (8 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

22 May 1916 Van (80 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

22 May 1916 Van (15 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

23 May 1916 Of (5 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

23 May 1916 Trabzon (2 thousand 86 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

23 May 1916 Van (3 yьz civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

25 May 1916 Bayezid (14 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

June 1916 Van-Abbasağa (14 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

June 1916 Edremid-Vastan (15 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

6 June 1916 Şatak-Serir (45 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

6 June 1916 Şatak (thousand 150 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

7 June 1916 Mьkьs-Serhan (121 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

14 August 1916 Bitlis (311 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1919 Sarıkamış (9 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1919 Tiksin-Ağadeve (5 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1919 Nahзivan (4 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

6 January 1919 Zaruşat (86 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

21 January 1919 Kilis (2 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

22 January 1919 Antep (1 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

25 January 1919 Kars (9 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

26 February 1919 Adana-Pozantı (4 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

18 May 1919 Osmaniye (1 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

13 June 1919 Pasinler (3 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

3 June 1919 Iğdır (8 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

July 1919 Sarıkamış (803 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

July 1919 Kurudere (8 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

July 1919 Sarıkamış (695 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

4 July 1919 Akзakale (180 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

5 July 1919 Kağızman (4 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

7 July 1919 Kars-Gцle (9 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

8 July 1919 Mescitli (4 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

8 July 1919 Gьlyantepe (10 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

9 July 1919 Kağızman (6 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

9 July 1919 Kurudere (8 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

11 July 1919 Mescitli (20 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

19 July 1919 Bulaklı (2 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

19 July 1919 Pasinler (2 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

24 July 1919 Kars-Kağızman (9 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

August 1919 Muhtelif kцyler (2 thousand 502 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

15 August 1919 Erzurum (153 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

15 August 1919 Erzurum (426 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

September 1919 Allahьekber (3 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

9 September 1919 Ьnye (12 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

14 September 1919 Sarıkamış (2 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

November 1919 Adana (4 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

11 November 1919 Maraş (2 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

6 November 1919 Ulukışla (7 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

7 December 1919 Adana (4 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1920 Gцle (600 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1920 Kars (3 thousand 945 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1920 Haramivartan (138 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1920 Nahзivan (64 thousand 408 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1920 Nahзivan (5 thousand 307 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

February 1920 Kars civarı (561 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1 February 1920 Zaruşat (2 thousand 150 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

2 February 1920 Şuregel (thousand 150 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

10 February 1920 Зıldır (100 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

28 February 1920 Pozantı (40 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

9 March 1920 Zaruşat (400 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

9 March 1920 Zaruşat (120 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

16 March 1920 Kağızman (720 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

22 March 1920 Şuregel-Zaruşat (2 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

6 April 1920 Gьmrь (500 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

28 April 1920 Kars (2 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

5 May 1920 Kars (thousand 774 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

22 May 1920 Kars (10 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

2 July 1920 Kars-Erzurum (408 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

2 July 1920 Zengebasar (thousand 500 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

27 July 1920 Erzurum (69 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

May 1920 Kars-Erzurum (27 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

August 1920 Oltu (650 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

August 1920 Kars-Erzurum (18 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

15 October 1920 Bayburt (thousand 387 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

20 October 1920 Gцle (100 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

17 October 1920 Pasinler (9 thousand 287 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

18 October 1920 Tortum (3 thousand 700 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

19 October 1920 Erzurum (8 thousand 439 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

26 October 1920 Kars civarı (10 thousand 693)

October 1920 Aşkale (889 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1 December 1920 Kosor (69 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

3 December 1920 Gцle (508 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

4 December 1920 Kosor (122 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

4 December 1920 Kars-Zeytun (28 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

4 December 1920 Sarıkamış (thousand 975 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

6 December 1920 Gцle (194 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

7 December 1920 Kars-Digor (14 thousand 620 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

14 December 1920 Sarıkamış (5 thousand 337 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

29 November 1920 Zaruşat (thousand 26 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

December 1920 Erivan (192 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1921 Nahзivan (12 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1921 Bayburt (580 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1921 Arpaзay (148 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1921 Karakilise (6 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1921 Karakilise ( 6 thousand civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

February 1921 Zenibasar (18 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

21 November 1921 Pasinler (53 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

21 November 1921 Erzurum (thousand 215 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1918 Hınıs (870 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

1918 Tercan (580 civilian turks killed by armenian militia)

March 1922 Maraş (4 civilian turks killed by armenian militia).

PKK-ARMENIAN RELATIONS TERROR

TERRORISM


PKK-ARMENIAN RELATIONS



Changing their tactics after the ‘80s as they encountered adverse reactions from the world. Now, it was time for PKK to carry on the mission. Their first terrorist act started at Eruh and Semdimli in 1984 while the ASALA-Armenian terror receded to the background. Some of the tangible proofs of the ties between Armenians and PKK are the following:



The terrorist organisation PKK announced the period from 21 to 28 April 1980 as the “Red Week” and started to organise meetings on April 24 as the anniversary of the alleged genocide against Armenians.



The PKK and ASALA terror organisations held a joint press conference on 8 April 1980 at the City of Sidon in Lebanon where they issued a declaration. Since this drew a considerable reaction, they decided that their relations should be maintained on a clandestine basis. The responsibility of the attacks launched against the Turkish Consulate General in Strasbourg on 9 November 1980 and the Turkish Airline office in Rome on 19 November 1980 were undertaken jointly by the ASALA and PKK.



Abdullah Öcalan, leader of the separatist terror organisation, was elected to the honorary membership of the Armenian Authors’ Association for “his contributions to the idea of Greater Armenia”.



A Kurdistan Committee was formed within the Armenian Popular Movement like in many European countries.



On 4 June 1993, a meeting was held at the headquarters of PKK terrorist organisation at West Beyrouth with the participation of representatives from the Armenian Hinchak Party, ASALA and PKK.



Another striking example of the Armenian-PKK ties are the following resolutions adopted in meetings held at two separate churches from 6 to 9 September 1993 with the participation of Lebanese Armenian Orthodox Archbishop, officials of the Armenian Party and about 150 youth leaders:



A somewhat sedate attitude should be reserved toward Turkey for the time being.



The Armenian community is on the way to growth and better economic strength.



The propaganda activities have started to make the genocide claims better understood in the rest of the world.



The newly founded Armenian State with a constantly growing territory will definitely avenge the ancestors of its citizens.



The Western powers and particularly the United States side with and favour the Armenians in the combat for Nagorno Karabakh. This opportunity should be well exploited as more and more Armenian young men join the ranks in this fight.



The perpetual terrorist attacks in Turkey (meaning the PKK’s actions) will continue and eventually collapse the country’s economy, leading to an uprising by the entire population.



Turkey will be abolish and a Kurdish State will be formed.



Armenians will hold good relations with the Kurds and support their fight.



Territories presently held by the Turks will the Armenian’s tomorrow.



PUBLICATION ORGANS OF TERRORIST ORGANISATION PKK IN ARMENIA



The newspapers Reya Taze and Bota Redaksiyon are published in Armenia in Cyrillic alphabet under the control of terrorist organisation PKK with the help of PKK members coming from Turkey and Europe and carries out propaganda for the PKK.



PKK-ASALA RELATIONS



The Armenian terrorism at international first started basis in 1973 and began to gain impetus after the 1974 Cyprus Peace Operation with attacks or terrorist nature against Turks and Turkish representations abroad with sabotages and outright assaults.



Upon resurrection of the Kurdish terrorist movement that began to show itself in a variety of legal political entities from ‘70s onward, the Armenian terror organisation ASALA ceded its place in 1984 to the PKK that killed without distinction of Turk or Kurd in a bloodthirsty manner under the guidance of Abdullah Öcalan.



Yet in prior to that date, of the co-operation between terrorist organisations ASALA and PKK was known manifesting in the training of ASALA militants at PKK’s trannie camps, the joint operations and declamations by them both and training support provided at the PKK camps by Armenian experts, not to mention the organic ties between the terrorist organisation PKK and Armenian Tashnak Sutyun Party.



The common goal of the co-operation between the terrorist organisations PKK and ASALA is to establish States in Turkey’s Southeastern and Eastern under the Marxist-Leninist ideology. Since, however, an overview of the areas on which both organisations had schemes, it may be deduced that one of these organisations acts as the other’s mercenaries.



An examination of the discovered documents revealed that the militants of ASALA and PKK terrorist organisations underwent training at the Bekaa and Zeli camps.



1987 AGREEMENT BETWEEN PKK AND ARMENIANS



An agreement was concluded between the separatist terror organisation PKK and Armenians in 1987. Following are the highlights of this agreement:



1. Armenians will be involved in training activities within the PKK terror organisation.



2. Five thousand American Dollars per annum will be paid to the PKK terror organisation per capita by the Armenian side.



3. The Armenians will participate in the small-scale operations.



As the Armenian component began to acquire a significantly elevated position within the organisation as a result of this agreement, the following resolutions were adopted in a meeting held on 18 April 1990 with a person named Hermes Samurai, reported to be the official responsible for the PKK-ASALA relations:



1. The PKK and ASALA terrorist organisations will be under a joint command from that date on.



2. The Armenians will undertake intelligence work on the Turkish security forces.



3. Territories gained through the expected revolution will be equally shared between the parties.



4. Seventy-five percent of training camp expenses will be borne by the Armenians.



5. Operations will be conducted at the metropolitan cities in Turkey.



The terrorist organisation PKK that moved its bases into Northern Iraq after because of very heavy blows dealt in the transborder operations and lost all possibilities of sheltering there is known to have entered into arrangements for shifting some of its cadres to Iran and Armenia where it started an active subversive operation toward Turkey.



It has also been learned that a group of European representatives of the terrorist organisation PKK paid a visit to Armenia where they concluded an agreement with the Armenian leaders for the unhindered ingress to and egress from Kars region by their militants, that Armenia offered sheltering, monetary and equipment support to the Kurdish settlements in that country following the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the formal proclamation of the Armenian Republic. Similarly, a group of militants of the terrorist organisation PKK left Urmiah for Armenia on three vehicles on 19 and 20 May 1992 for fighting against Azerite Turks together with the Armenians.

150 years ago armenians were moved to Karabagh

Maragashen - Leninavan.This monument was built by Armenians in 1978.For symbol of their migration to Azerbaijan lands. Then this monument was destroyed by Armenians.

Historical Roots of the IDP Crisis in Azerbaijan


Ali Hasanov

Deputy Prime Minister, Chairman

State Committee on Work with Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons

Karabakh and the surrounding mountainous area are considered one of the ancient and culturally rich regions of Azerbaijan. Azykh grotto is one of the first places of human origin and also it is a source of pre-Islamic culture. Albanian-Christian temples and cultural monuments of the Islamic era, generated throughout thousands of years, compose this rich cultural heritage and wealth. Karabakh is a fundamental part of Azerbaijan’s history, culture and national identity.



Azerbaijan’s geo-strategic location and rich natural resources are key components of interest in the region. Therefore, the territory of Azerbaijan has been the site of various bloody wars, with the foundation of these conflicts being laid in the late 18th century. To best understand the current IDP crisis in Azerbaijan it is important to examine the progression of events that shaped the history and foreshadowed the future of Azerbaijan.



In 1721-23, Peter I invaded Azerbaijani territories along the Caspian, including Baku. Having faced strong resistance from local people, Peter the Great decided to use the so called “Armenian card” and ordered to settle Armenians in historical Azerbaijani lands, especially in Baku and Derbend.



This historical heritage addressed by Peter I to his successors formed the policies of the Russian Empire, but also provided the core of Bolshevik Russia’s South Caucasus policy. In 1768, Ekaterina II announced a decree of imperial trustee over Armenians and in 1802 Tsar Alexander I conveyed an order to the Caucasus police Sisianov when he declared that: “Armenians should be used at any cost to occupy the Azerbaijani khanates.” This was the start of the occupation of Azerbaijani territories.



As a result of war of 1826-1828; 18,000 Armenian families were moved to the South Caucasus from Iran and southern lands of Azerbaijan. In the next two years, 40,000 Armenians from Iran and 84,000 Armenians from Turkey were moved to Elizavetpol and Irevan provinces. In March of 1828, immediately after the Turkmenchay Treaty, the decree of Emperor Nikolay I established the “Armenian province” within the Irevan and Nakhchivan khanates.



As a result of these policies, the foundation of the future Armenian state within the Azerbaijani lands was laid. According to the official statistics of the period; 7,331 Azerbaijanis and 2,369 Armenians were living in the Irevan city, which was the center of the “Armenian province.” In addition, according to the Turkmenchay Treaty; 40,000 Armenians from Iran were moved to Azerbaijani lands, namely Irevan, Karabakh and Nakhchivan. A similar process unfolded during the Russian-Turkish wars of 1829 and 1878, when about 85,000 Armenians were moved to the above-mentioned regions from Turkey. Consequently, this process contributed to the displacement of thousands of Azerbaijanis from their homelands.



In the second half of the 19th century, the massacre of Azerbaijanis by Armenians acquired stronger organizational character and was implemented as a more integrated planned policy. Armenians with the intention of building “Great Armenia” in the territories of Azerbaijan, Turkey and Georgia instigated the activities of the political-terrorist organizations like “Hnchaq” (1887, Geneva), “Dashnaksutyun” (1890, Tbilisi), and “Union of Armenian Patriots” (1895, New-York).





One of the main goals of these organizations was to intimidate and pressure Azerbaijanis to move out from their homeland. The revolution of 1905-1907 created more opportunities for these organizations and during this revolutionary period many Azerbaijanis in Baku, Shusha, Zangezur, and Garabagh were massacred by Armenians. Even after the 1905-1907 revolution, mass deportation of Azerbaijanis continued while many Armenians were moving into the occupied territories. According to the Russian statistical reports published in 1916, during the 1830-1914 years the population of the Irevan province had increased 40 times to nearly 570,000 people. However, the Azerbaijani population living in the region increased just 4.6 times. Despite this oppression and deportation, in 1916 about 45% of the population of the Irevan city, that is 247,000, were Azerbaijanis.



World War I and the Great Russian Revolution of 1917, created another opportunity for Armenians to accomplish their “Great Armenia” plan. In 1915, over the course of World War I, the majority of Armenians living in the northeast regions of Turkey were deported to Irevan, Karabakh and Zangezur provinces. Supported by Moscow and their Russian army, Armenians continued to persecute Azerbaijanis in Nakhchivan, Irevan, Karabakh and many other regions of Azerbaijan.



In December of 1917, according to the Arzinjan agreement signed between the Ottoman state and the Bolsheviks’ Caucasus Commissariat, Armenian armed forces replaced the Russian army that was withdrawn from the Caucasus. As a result, by the end of March 1918, nearly two hundred Azerbaijani villages were destroyed in the Irevan province, while thousands of Azerbaijanis were massacred by Armenians.



In December 1917, Stepan Shaumyan, who was appointed an emergency commissar in the Caucasus by Russia’s People’s Commissars Soviet, was given the authority to implement the sovietization policy in the South Caucasus and create “Turkish Armenia” in the Turkish territories under Russian occupation. As a consequence of the Brest-Litovsk peace treaty (March 1918), Russian troops left Kars, Ardagan, and Batumi, and these territories were returned to Turkey. However, some of the Russian and Armenian troops that returned from Iran and Turkey were placed in Baku. Commissar Shaumyan utilized this opportunity against Azerbaijanis.



In March 30, 1918 Armenian-Bolshevik united forces launched an attack on Azerbaijani settlements and during 3 days of violence some 17,000 people were massacred in Baku. The Armenian-Bolshevik forces confiscated many properties and destroyed many historical landmarks of Baku. In March and April of 1918, close to 50,000 Azerbaijanis in Baku, Shamakhy, Guba, Mugan and Lankaran were killed, and many more people were forcefully displaced.





In April 13, 1918 the organizer of this massacre Shaumyan confessed in his letter to the Russian People’s Commissars Soviet: “We used the armed attacks on our infantry as an excuse and attacked along the front. We already had 6,000 armed forces. Dashnaks also had 3-4 thousand military forces, which were under our authority. Their participation especially gave the attribute of national massacre to the civil war. But it was impossible to prevent it. We went on this while being conscious. If the Azerbaijanis would prevail, then Baku could be announced capital of Azerbaijan.”



Nevertheless, after the dissolution of the Caucasus Seym in May 27, 1918 Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia announced their independence. The Emergency Investigation Commission established by the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic (ADR) on July 15, 1918 collected a number of documents and materials related to these events. Unfortunately the collapse of the ADR in April of 1920 terminated the investigation process that would otherwise reveal adequate information and the scale of this massacre and destruction.



In order to prevent the spread of bolshevism, the western states considered the existence of independent Caucasus states important. However, they stated that ADR’s independence would be recognized only if Irevan was given to Armenia as a capital. Azerbaijan had to compromise in order to defend its independence and gain recognition by the international community. As a result, thousands of Azerbaijanis living in Irevan province were forced to move out of the region.



In 1920, as a result of Bolshevik Russia’s military aggression, Azerbaijan’s independence was brought to an end. The Dashnak Armenia was also occupied by the Soviets. In 1920, Soviet Russia handed in Azerbaijan’s Zengezur province to Armenia; and in 1923, the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast was artificially created.



Almost 70 years of the Soviet regime significantly altered Azerbaijani history. The forced displacement of Azerbaijanis from their homeland continued during the Soviet period. The deportation of 100,000 Azerbaijanis living in Armenia to the Kura-Araz valley of Azerbaijan perpetrated during Stalin’s regime in 1948-1953 is worth a separate note.



In 1985, with the beginning of Michael Gorbachev’s rule Armenians and the others supporting them tried to materialize the plan for “Great Armenia” that they had been cherishing for decades.



Beginning in 1988, some more than 250,000 Azerbaijanis living in Armenia were turned out of their native land by the way of terror. As a result of this policy of ethnic cleansing, 216 people were killed. Thus the last stage of the Armenian nationalists’ policy of “Armenia without Turks” was realized; Armenia became a mono-ethnic state.



By the summer of 1991, the war in Nagorno-Karabakh became evident. The collapse of the Soviet Union gave a push to the organized Armenian military groups to begin large-scale military activities in Nagorno-Karabakh. In February 25-26, 1992 Armenian military units that were positioned in Nagorno-Karabakh supported by Khankendi-based 366th Russian motorized infantry regiment made a massive assault on Azerbaijani town of Khojaly killing 613 peaceful citizens.



Between 1991-1993, Armenian armed forces occupied some 20% of Azerbaijani land, namely Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent regions. Nearly 700,000 Azerbaijanis became refugees in their native land, and almost 20,000 people were killed, 250,000 were injured. As a result of the military aggression, the damage to the state economy has been more than 60 billion US dollars. Many Azerbaijani refugees driven out of their native country were obliged to live in unbearable conditions.



After coming to power again in 1993, Heydar Aliyev began work towards eliminating the results of this humanitarian misfortune. For this a legal basis was established according to international norms, and many state programs were adopted. The very first oil revenues were spent for social security and to better the life of refugees and internally displaced persons. The decree signed in March 26, 1998 by Heydar Aliyev is the first legal-political assessment of the crimes and terror of this ongoing conflict. The decree revealed many facts that had been banned for decades and confirmed that March 31 will be the Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis.



Ilham Aliyev informed the public before the presidential elections that there would not be any refugee tent settlement during the next five years of his tenure. President Aliyev kept his promise and in December 2007 the last tent was disassembled.



With the growth of the economic potential of the state, the measures relating to the social protection of internally displaced persons grow as well. Over 270,000 internally displaced persons are provided with monthly food products and basic necessities. Continuous improvement and development of the temporary settlement is among the highest priorities of our government.



Apparently, the sustainable solution to the refugee problem may only be possible after the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh is resolved. Our leadership will continue to make every effort to resolve this issue. Our occupied territories will be freed and our internally displaced persons will return back to their homeland.